French/British
Encouragement

The following is taken from The Whiskey Rebellion by Thomas P.
Slaughter, 1986, by Oxford University Press:
The French menace in Europe drove American and British
governments closer together during the summer Of 1794. After
preparing for war against Great Britain earlier in the year, the
Washington administration now feared the French Revolution on the
one side and its own back country citizenry on the other even
more than it resented British assaults on neutral trading
vessels. For reasons having more to do with France than the North
American wilderness, Britain had also decided to abandon,
temporarily at least, its efforts to annex Vermont, western
Pennsylvania, and Kentucky. Wayne's victory at Fallen Timbers
came at a critical time in negotiations between the two nations,
and it convinced British officials that an American treaty was
more urgent, and more likely, than an Indian alliance to help
dismember the United States.
Canadian officials and Tory refugees had collaborated since
1783 with disaffected citizens in western Pennsylvania for
secession of the region and reunion with Great Britain. Canadian
Governor Simcoe still hoped that there might be an American war,
and continued during 1794 to shuttle agents into and out of the
western country. He tried to capitalize on the fortuitous
uprising of whiskey rebels during the summer, but he received no
support from his superiors back in London. Indeed, his
correspondence was leaked to the American government, thus
providing the Washington administration with details of
negotiations between rebel sympathizers and British agents.
Simcoe exaggerated his possibilities for success, inflated the
numbers of frontiersmen sympathetic to reunion with Great
Britain, and minimized the costs of British connivance in such
schemes. Washington and Hamilton took Simcoe's analysis at
face-value, however, and this information became a source of fear
and provided a justification for armed suppression of the
insurgency.
As early as March 1794, British Ambassador to the United
States George Hammond had reported that frontiersmen were arming
for war. An estimated 2000 Kentuckians were poised to attack the
Spanish out post at New Orleans, hoping to free the Mississippi
for transportation of western crops to market. By June, Britain's
ambassador was convinced that "the project of opening by
force the navigation of the Mississippi is not merely a transient
sentiment of individuals, but is the fixed universal
determination of the great mass of the inhabitants of that part
of the American territory." He conceived the federal
government powerless to prevent such enterprises and interpreted
the series of presidential proclamations forbidding such actions
as futile. Hammond assessed the commercial interests Of western
and eastern states as so utterly conflicting that the adherence
of the former to the federal Constitution and the political
connection itself between the two divisions of the continent
depend on a very precarious sort of tenure."
When the Whiskey Rebellion erupted some months later, British
observers were not in the least surprised. Although opposition to
the excise provided an "avowed pretext" for
hostilities, Hammond was convinced that the real cause was the
same as in previous inter-regional conflicts, a rooted
aversion" to central governance. Other British officials on
the scene agreed that the United States now faced its gravest
crisis since the Revolution; that events in western Pennsylvania
during July and August were the culmination of western unrest
over the past twenty years. Some predicted victory for the rebels
in a frontier wide independence movement, while others
anticipated that " a temporary suppression of this revolt
may happen." But all commentators believed that the Union
would not long survive in its present form.
The opinions of foreign observers were reinforced by persons
claiming to be agents of the rebels. On two separate occasions,
men "of very decent manners and appearance" contacted
the British ambassador for the purpose of negotiating an alliance
between the western country and his nation. The visitors told
Hammond that "they were dissatisfied with the [U. S.]
government and were determined to separate from it." In
return for arms and perhaps other support, they were prepared to
offer the allegiance of their region to the British monarch. The
minister feared that word of this meeting would leak out and
embarrass his nation's ongoing negotiations with the United
States. He delivered the rebels a stern rebuff and apparently
reported the unsolicited rendezvous to Alexander Hamilton as well
as to London . The Washington administration thus had good reason
to share Hammond's interpretation Of events on the frontier.
The Spanish minister in Philadelphia received similar visits
by Kentuckians and western Pennsylvanians during 1794, and also
assumed a connection between the whiskey rebels and other
frontier conspirators. Since Ambassador Joseph de Jaudene's
government was, for reasons similar to the British, uninterested
in dismembering the American frontier at this time, he paid small
sums to frontier agents in return for future information and good
will, encouraged them in their pursuits, and promised Spanish
interest in an alliance after they secured independence from the
United States. Federal officials learned of these discussions as
well, and thus knew that frontier incendiaries actively sought
the assistance of European powers for secession attempts. They
feared that fluctuations in European events might quickly lead to
changes in policy. Overnight, Spanish and British officials could
become more actively concerned in schemes to subdivide the United
States.